Tata most valuable brand, Airtel at number 2


Image result for tataTata group has held on to top spot, brand value dropped by 4% over 2016: Brand Finance India 2017

The House of Tatas has retained its position as India’s leading brand in valuation firm Brand Finance’s annual study of the country’s top 100 names. But the 150-year-old group’s has fallen four per cent to $13.1 billion in 2017 over 2016, according to findings shared exclusively by the UK-based valuation firm with Business Standard. The firm, however, says the drop is not a result of the boardroom battle the diversified conglomerate witnessed in the last few months, which saw erstwhile chairman Cyrus Mistry ousted in October last year.

“There has been intense speculation as to whether has fallen due to Tata’s boardroom drama,” David Haigh, CEO, Brand Finance said. “In our view this is emphatically not the case. Tata’s brand strength index score in fact improved significantly this year and its rating was upgraded from A+ to AA+,” he said.

Haigh says the drop seen this year, while not being positive for the group, is lower than the decline of nearly 11 per cent seen between 2015 and 2016. In 2015, Tata’s was pegged at $15.3 billion, which fell to $13.7 billion in 2016. But a comparison of Tata’s based on Brand Finance figures released over the years shows that the group’s 2017 valuation number is the lowest in five years, which some experts say, points to the impact of the boardroom battle on the brand.

The battle saw Mistry and the group trading allegations and counter-allegations in public with the matter finally dragged to court. The national company law tribunal, however, dismissed last month a petition filed by minority shareholders of Sons linked to Mistry, which alleged that the group holding company had committed acts of oppression and mismanagement against their and public interest.

 

Haigh says the drop in this year is due to challenges faced by the salt-to-software group in multiple industries. “Operating conditions in these industries are challenging for all participants. In this context the slight decline can be seen as a stabilisation in challenging times,” Haigh said. “We expect to return to growth soon as the new chairman settles in and attempts to streamline operations,” he said.

 

In fact, the four per cent and nearly 11 per cent decline witnessed by the brand in the last five years is not the only one seen by the group in that period. The sharpest fall was in 2014, when the eroded 19 per cent to touch $14.7 billion versus $18.1 billion in 2013. Back then, this drop in was ascribed to the many challenges the group faced in industries such as steel and telecom.
Viveat Susan Pinto  |  Mumbai
Click Here for the full story and the Top 10 Brands

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s